Elder Abuse – MISLEADING AND FALSE ASSERTIONS by DriveABLE.

1. FALSE ASSERTIONS which have been PUBLISHED on DriveABLE sites.

1) “It is our goal to protect competent drivers”.
“We PROTECT safe drivers from MISIDENTIFICATION”.

This is an UNTRUTH. In that DriveABLE frequently misclassifies safe drivers as being UNSAFE. Then, these victimized seniors have to spend hundreds or even thousands of dollars, endure great anguish and distress to right the injustice.

DriveABLE or its’ subsidiaries NEVER apologize or REFUND COST of those whom they have wronged by MiSCLASSIFICATION

2) “Through AWARD WINNING university RESEARCH, we’ve developed the DCAT “

This is an UNTRUTH

3) The DriveABLE Cognitive Assessment Tool;
“It’s the only cognitive assessment shown to be HIGHLY PREDICTIVE of actual on-road performance”.

UNTRUE. We have documented that the DRIVEABLE COMPUTER BASED ASSESSMENT is NOT HIGHLY PREDICTIVE of actual on-road performance & FREQUENTLY MISIDENTIFIES safe drivers as unsafe.

• “BC’s COMPUTERIZED TEST UNFAIR TO SENIORS”
Originally published in Victoria Times Colonist. – CARP Canada.

• https://elderadvocates.ca/simard-md-driveable-no-peer-review/

March 31, 2018